A honey like substance was splattered on a witness’ windshield while she was driving in California in April 2000, as well as on the car’s windshield behind her. The woman took photographs that are shown in this paper, and a small sample of this material was sent to Clifford Carnicom for analysis. There is fibrous material in the sample as well. This occurred under a clear sky with no obvious reason for this material to have landed on this car. Of note are two similar instances of what appeared to be identical materials observed, one in July 2000 in Albuquerque New Mexico that was experienced by Clifford Carnicom, where a material landed on his car windshield that was similar form and color to that of the samples sent to him previously. Another report from a witness in North Carolina claimed in August 2000 that a very similar material was found on her car windshield.
A ground fiber sample received previously in November 1999 is observed and pictured in this paper under a microscope and black light, and is compared to other known and unknown synthetic fibers. A notable thing from this observation is that the ground fibers show a low level of fluorescence, whereas the synthetics compared to show a high level of fluorescence. The ground fiber samples also showed sub-micron diameter, and high levels of adhesiveness and elasticity. Additional data and feedback of the current investigations underway with UV light is most welcome.
This page is a documentary as to the number of mailings that have been sent to politicians, television stations, the California Attorney General, the EPA and others by one Rick Moors. Mr. Moors also chronicles how many replies he has received, and each of Mr. Moor’s letters sent and received are included in this page. Each of the replies contains the standard ‘these trails are normal’ verbiage.
Very unusual, tightly aligned aerosols are photographed together and attached to this page. The spray lines are all in parallel, and are shown close up and later starting to spread out.
Characteristics of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae are presented here, including electron microscope images of this organism, the etiology of this organism, and its pathology. This information is detailed as to how it may relate to the biologicals being found in the aerosol programs.
Driven by repeated observations of aerial spraying in the United States in the years from 1996-2000, a statistically significant study of airborne microscopic particle count data from the State of New Mexico was conducted, with approximately 175,000 observations of hourly monitored data from five stations in the state analyzed. This statistical test has been designed to question the difference between the data of 1999 (Data set 1) vs. the combined data of the three previous years from 1996-1998 (Data set 2).
The results show that there is a significant statistical difference between the magnitudes, averages, and variances of the two data sets. The conclusion to be reached from this study is that the microscopic air particle count in the state of New Mexico in 1999 is significantly different from that of the preceding three years, and that this difference is directly correlated with the observations of aerial spraying that have taken place during this same time period. The results of this study form a further basis for criminal investigation of the documented spray activity and for congressional hearings on this subject.
BOOM ATTRACTS MAINSTREAM MEDIA: RECENT ARTICLE FROM THE COLUMBUS, GEORGIA LEDGER ENQUIRER FEB 11 2000 SUBMITTED TO www.carnicom.com BY A CONCERNED CITIZEN
A copy of the Certified Receipt showing EPA Administrator received Clifford Carnicom’s sample.
Here is a copy of the Certified Receipt showing EPA Administrator Carol M. Browner received Clifford Carnicom’s sample, but had yet to reply.
A lengthy letter from the EPA, sent to a concerned citizen and copied on this page, is a complete denial of the possibility of aerosols and aerosol operations. The letter speaks a common theme of denial that the spray lines, witnessed by an increasing number of people and spreading out across the sky, are simply normal contrail exhaust from aircraft engines.
Pictures on this page show unusual samples from Sacramento, California that a witness sent in to the Carnicom Institute. These samples, which are white and of granular or powder form, are not at all similar to the fibrous microscopic samples sent in and discussed earlier. The significance of this ground sample, as well as the identification of it, remains unknown at this time.
A witness sent in two photos that show colored clouds, possibly indicating chemicals in the clouds from aerosol spraying. Though the witness said you couldn’t see the colors with the naked eye, the colors in the videotape (and seen in the pictures posted on this page), pink, green, yellow and purple, stayed visible for about 2 minutes.
Three photos show massive aerosol trails left in the skies above Santa Fe, New Mexico on September 8, 2000.
The following message by the Department of Defense was recently posted on the Chemtrail Tracking Club at Yahoo