The following account was received on Jan 19 2000:
A comprehensive briefing package on the aerosol issue containing photographs, testimonies, research references and petitions for congressional action on this issue was hand delivered by a prominent media person to Congressional Representative Thomas Udall of New Mexico on September 2, 1999. After no response for evaluation was received back by late November 1999, second and third letters were sent asking for a reply from Representative Udall. Mr. Udall finally sent a form letter back in March of 2000 to the deliverer of the material, stating that he had made a request for Congress to hold hearings on this matter. A spokesman for Representative Udall later stated no such request had been made to Congress by Representative Udall.
Notice has been received on 01-13-00 that the World Net Daily, a leading internet newspaper, will be 'passing' on the presentation of an article on the aerosol issue. Two days prior to this announcement, an impending article on the aerosol issue was indicated by this same newspaper. No specific reason for the cancellation or postponement of the article was stated, other than that the issue had been forwarded to higher editorial management.
ABC NEWS 20/20 SAYS 'UNFORTUNATELY'
IT WAS NOT CHOSEN
An open invitation is posted on www.carnicominstitute.org on this date that challenges anyone who refutes the veracity of evidence presented and analyzed on this website to contact the institute and set up a meeting of minds for a discussion on proof present in the Carnicom papers. “This invitation is open to ANYONE with doubt of the evidence presented”.
Postscript note by Clifford E Carnicom:
One would logically conclude that the EPA, having viewed the evidence submitted on www.carnicom.com, IS now quite aware of "such applications" by "such aircraft."
Pictures captured and posted in this paper show massive aerosol trails sprayed in criss-cross patterns in Santa Fe, New Mexico on November 3, 1999.
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DECLARES THAT IT IS 'UNABLE' TO COMPLETE AN INVESTIGATION
This letter was recently received by a Ohio citizen:
This set of photos shows aerosol emissions extending across the entire wingspan of a McDonnell Douglas MD80 aircraft on November 30, 1999 in Santa Fe, New Mexico . This aircraft has rear mounted engines, showing that this wide span of aerosols cannot be emanating from the engines alone. These pictures show the same entire wingspan results that have been witnessed in previous Carnicom papers named THIRD ‘MEGASPRAYER’ CAPTURED (September 9, 1999), NEW CHEMTRAIL SPRAY SYSTEM REVEALED (August 14, 1999), and NEW CHEMTRAIL SPRAY SYSTEM CONFIRMED (August 14, 1999).
NM ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE SUBSTANTIATES THAT ACTIVITY IS 'NORMAL'
University of Michigan Correspondence with Individual Seeking Information on Nano Technology Research Program:
TIME LINE OVERVIEW: 1. Letter to Dr. Jones - DARPA - Nov. 15th from A. C. Griffith. 2. Reply from the Director of DARPA, Lawrence H. Dubois, Nov. 16th to A.C. Griffith. 3. A.C.Griffith made one telephone call and one e-mail to Univ. of Mich., News and Information Service, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Nov. 17th. 4. E-mail to A.C. Griffith received from Officer Sura on computer in Winston-Salem. 5. Telephone message to A.C. Griffith on answering machine in Richmond from Officer Sura, University of Michigan, sometime between Nov. 19 and Nov. 21, 1999. 6. Reply letter to Officer Sura dated Nov. 22, 1999.
In this paper, pictures captured and posted by Clifford Carnicom in the southern sky of Santa Fe, New Mexico on November 20, 1999, show massive trails sprayed in various patterns at different altitudes and spreading out into persistent trails.
Photographs depicting clumps of fibrous looking material scattered on the ground are presented in this paper, and were taken by a witness in Sedona, Arizona on July 10, 1999. These samples were found on the ground after numerous townspeople reported hearing low flying aircraft the previous night. The samples, which reportedly made some people ill, had a petrochemical odor, and dissipated by mid-morning.
Microscopic views are presented of two filaments taken from a ground fiber sample after aerial spraying in eastern Oregon on November 2nd and November 4th, 1999. Observation and analysis indicate that the samples appear to be a polymer of some type, being both extremely elastic and adhesive, raising the possibility that this material may act as a carrier mechanism. The materials are white, and look like spider webs. The materials, under magnification, show individual strands that are wave-like in nature, and tend to coalesce and congeal easily. Ill health effects have been reported in association with the handling of this material. This material is reported to dissipate within a few hours of falling on the ground, and in being exposed to the weather. The ground fiber sample images are compared to and found not to be spider webs, and to be fully synthetic. Common health effects associated with this spraying include severe respiratory problems, burning eyes, feeling tired, and some people coughing up blood.
Eyewitness accounts of finding unusual fiber materials on the ground have been accumulated over the past year and more in direct connection with unusual aircraft activity. As might be expected, there are repeated, frequent and widespread accounts of respiratory distress and allergic reactions reported in association with such aircraft activity. This paper continues previous research on and presents microscopic views of suspected chemtrail ground samples collected in November and December 1999. Two identical ground fiber samples (one from Sacramento, CA, and one from eastern Oregon) were received, analyzed and compared to synthetic and natural fibers, such as human hair, wool, silk, spider webs, cotton and more. Though found in locations hundreds of miles apart, these two ground fibers exhibited identical characteristics in all respects down to the microscopic level. Based on tests outlined in this paper, it has been demonstrated that the ground sample fibers cannot be identified as any known or common natural or synthetic fiber.