PREDICTING THE OPERATIONS:
SUNSPOTS AND HUMIDITY
Sep 3 2002
Edited Oct 08 2002
Edited Nov 08 2002
Edited Oct 29 2003
(Recommend printing in landscape mode)
Clifford E Carnicom
SANTA FE REPORT : INDEX ON 112702 AT 0900 IS 44
Model correlation is statistically significant at 98% level as of 11/08/02
Additional Notes Oct 29 2003:
Please note that this article was authored on Sep 3 2002. The additional factor of vertical column aerosol density, most easily measured by star magnitude visibility, appears also to be significant in the prediction of the onset of the aerosol operations in a particular region.
Research over an extended period of time indicates that there is likely a strong relationship between the appearance of the aerosol operations in a given locale and time and the interaction of the following primary variables: sunspot activity, relative humidity, change in relative humidity and the relative cloud cover. The inclusion of the solar activity within this current examination may be a significant avenue of research that establishes a series of ties with earlier discussions related to ionospheric, electromagnetic and defense projects, applications of HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) and plasma physics that also appear on this site. Current studies on planetary physics and celestial considerations may demonstrate further relationships to the aerosol operations in the future.
This current work expands upon earlier presentations that have been made in the spring of 2001 related primarily to the relative humidity issue. These papers are available at The Aerosol Reports : United States; A Model Under Development and The Aerosol Report. This earlier work focused upon the consideration of relative humidity values across the nation in conjunction with observed aerosol operations. The result of that earlier work indicated a close link between increased relative humidity levels that were scaled according to local conditions and the likelihood of concurrent aerosol operations. Other researchers and considerable anecdotal information have also added to that body of correlations that now exist.
Since that time, increased attention has been given to the drought crisis that has emerged over the last three to four years, and further links from a scientific standpoint have been made to the aerosol operations with these events. Readers may wish to refer to the following paper Drought Inducement as well as an audio interview with Mr. Jeff Rense (June 4, 2002) on this same topic. Readers may also wish to become familiar with the the refuting arguments that I have made against any so-called “global warming mitigation” aerosol theories (e.g., Edward Teller) that have been proffered by certain well-publicized journalists and broadcasters. Analysis indicates that the introduced aerosols will aggravate the so-called “global warming” problem rather than lessen it. My concerns on the drought issue and the potential crisis that is likely to affect food production and water availability now and in the future have only been amplified since those presentations were made. It appears to me that it will be difficult, if not impossible, for the drought to subside and crops to improve as long as the aerosol operations continue unchecked without public outcry and action.
Local atmospheric electricity and magnetometer observations have also been added to the data set as of Sep 21 2002 and Oct 07 2002 respectively. These observations are a part of current research that expands upon that presented within this page, and they will be explained further at a later time.
This paper will again be divided into two sections. The latter half will outline the more technical aspects of the study, whereas the general findings are presented above.
Further Discussion:
An empirical model has now been developed of the following form:
I = c * [(log(SS+1) / 2.5)4 * (log(RHmean+1) / 2)2 * ((deltaRH + deltaRHmax) / (2 * deltaRHmax)) * cos(%CC * (pi / 200))] + 10
where
SS = daily sunspot number
RHmean = average of relative humidity in per cent at ground location(RHgnd) for the site of interest and the relative humidity in percent at commercial flight elevation(RHel) (250mb).
deltaRH = the change in average relative humidity in per cent from the previous day for the site of interest
deltaRHmax = the absolute value of the maximum change in average relative humidity in per cent from the previous day for the site of interest over the time interval that the model is to be used.
c = a constant, defined as 80 /I’max
where I’max = the maximum value of the product : (log(SS+1) / 2.5)4 * (log(RHmean + 1) / 2)2 * ((deltaRH + deltaRHmax) / (2 * deltaRHmax))* cos(%CC * (pi / 200))
reached during the time interval that the model is to be used.
CC = cloud cover index estimated according to the following table:
Condition |
CC Index |
Evaluation of CC Term |
Clear |
0 |
1 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.92 |
Partly Cloudy |
50 |
0.71 |
Mostly Cloudy |
75 |
0.38 |
Rain or Complete Cloud Cover |
100 |
0.0 |
I represents an index value, scaled between 0 and 100 (for usual circumstances), that indicates the suitability of conditions for (and increased likelihood for) the aerosol operations to be conducted. Lower values indicate less favorable circumstances for the aerosol operations to occur, and higher values more favorable cirumstances for the aerosol operations to occur.The following is the specific model being used for the Santa Fe NM region at this time:
I = 175 * [(log(SS+1) / 2.5)4 * (log(RHmean + 1) / 2)2 * ((deltaRH + 35) / 70) * cos(%CC * (pi / 200))] + 10
This specific model as well as the original form will be modified or revised freely as circumstances require, and it is to be considered as preliminary. In particular, the deltaRHmax term is likely to increase as a longer time interval is used for the model. .
To illustrate the use of this model, a table of data will be presented for the Santa Fe area, along with the results of the model as compared to observation reports for the same time period.
Date |
Time |
SS |
RHgnd |
RHel |
RHmean |
dRH |
Natural |
CC Index |
I’ |
I |
Comments/Observations |
Local |
Local |
delM |
0727 |
1000 |
323 |
58 |
NA |
58 |
11 |
Clear |
0 |
0.52 |
101 |
Blitz. Extraordinary activity reported in TX, NM, CO.. Normal range of model exceeded. |
|||
0821 |
2200 |
209 |
26 |
31 |
28 |
NA |
Clear |
0 |
NA |
NA |
NA.. Start of modeling; eliminate from scoring of model. |
|||
0822 |
0900 |
238 |
16 |
21 |
18 |
-10 |
Clear |
0 |
0.12 |
31 |
Light ops |
|||
0823 |
0900 |
205 |
38 |
40 |
39 |
21 |
Clear |
0 |
0.37 |
75 |
Heavy ops |
|||
0824 |
0800 |
207 |
43 |
57 |
50 |
11 |
Clear |
0 |
0.36 |
72 |
Heavy ops |
|||
0825 |
0830 |
199 |
23 |
15 |
19 |
-31 |
Clear |
0 |
0.02 |
14 |
No ops directly observed; unusual transformations of aerosol “clouds” in PM; observations insufficient and indeterminate; eliminate from scoring of model. |
|||
0826 |
0900 |
136 |
16 |
57 |
36 |
17 |
Clear |
0 |
0.24 |
52 |
No ops, Jemez Mtn. fire in PM |
|||
0827 |
0900 |
105 |
14 |
17 |
15 |
-21 |
Clear |
0 |
0.03 |
15 |
No ops |
|||
0827 |
2400 |
133 |
46 |
NA |
46 |
31 |
Mostly |
25 |
0.29 |
61 |
Moist air arrival in PM; heavy ops in PM |
|||
0828 |
0900 |
133 |
63 |
36 |
49 |
3 |
Partly |
50 |
0.14 |
34 |
Light to med ops |
|||
0829 |
0900 |
87 |
93 |
40 |
66 |
17 |
Partly |
50 |
0.16 |
38 |
Much moisture in sky; light to med ops |
|||
0830 |
0900 |
146 |
72 |
19 |
45 |
-21 |
Clear |
0 |
0.08 |
24 |
Light ops to none |
|||
0831 |
0900 |
150 |
43 |
45 |
44 |
-1 |
Clear |
0 |
0.19 |
43 |
None in Santa Fe(SF) region w/ clear skies; Heavy local ops on east horizon approx 200 miles easterly; aerosol cloud bank on east horizon |
|||
0901 |
0900 |
153 |
51 |
32 |
41 |
-3 |
Partly Cloudy |
50 |
0.12 |
31 |
Light to Med ops east of SF in AM; none in PM. Increasing cumulus clouds. Humidity decreases in PM. |
|||
0902 |
0900 |
187 |
52 |
28 |
40 |
-1 |
Mostly |
75 |
0.08 |
24 |
Mostly cloudy skies; No ops visible within clear patches. |
|||
0903 |
0900 |
227 |
68 |
32 |
50 |
10 |
Mostly |
75 |
0.14 |
34 |
Mostly Cloudy skies. No ops visible within clear patches. |
|||
0904 |
1000 |
266 |
49 |
17 |
33 |
-17 |
Clear |
0 |
0.14 |
34 |
No ops |
|||
0905 |
1000 |
215 |
34 |
21 |
27 |
-6 |
Clear |
0 |
0.16 |
38 |
No ops |
|||
0906 |
0800 |
225 |
46 |
59 |
52 |
25 |
Clear |
0 |
0.51 |
99 |
Very heavy ops in western sky and ABQ; progressive activities and dispersals over Santa Fe; numerous reports of heavy ops at several locations in U.S.A. |
|||
0907 |
0900 |
189 |
44 |
33 |
38 |
-14 |
Partly |
50 |
0.09 |
26 |
Light to no ops. Increasing cloudiness |
|||
0908 |
0900 |
180 |
54 |
29 |
42 |
4 |
Mostly |
25 |
0.23 |
50 |
No ops |
|||
0909 |
0830 |
221 |
75 |
51 |
63 |
21 |
Mostly |
75 |
0.19 |
44 |
Light to no ops visible w/in clear patches of sky. Increasing cloudiness through day. |
|||
0910 |
0900 |
194 |
88 |
33 |
60 |
-3 |
Rain |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rain. No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. |
|||
0911 |
0900 |
226 |
98 |
36 |
67 |
7 |
Rain |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rain. No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. |
|||
0912 |
0800 |
213 |
90 |
38 |
64 |
-3 |
Mostly |
75 |
0.11 |
29 |
No ops within clear patches. |
|||
0913 |
0830 |
258 |
89 |
24 |
45 |
-19 |
Clear |
0 |
0.27 |
57 |
No ops |
|||
0914 |
0900 |
246 |
72 |
23 |
47 |
2 |
Partly |
50 |
0.22 |
49 |
No ops. Reports of heavy activities in eastern US. |
|||
0915 |
0900 |
256 |
71 |
22 |
46 |
-1 |
Clear |
0 |
0.30 |
62 |
No ops |
|||
0916 |
0800 |
168 |
86 |
13 |
50 |
4 |
Clear |
0 |
0.25 |
54 |
No ops |
|||
0917 |
0900 |
190 |
67 |
27 |
47 |
-3 |
Clear |
0 |
0.22 |
48 |
No ops |
|||
0918 |
0900 |
228 |
53 |
38 |
46 |
-1 |
Partly |
25 |
0.25 |
53 |
No ops. Increasing cloudiness throughout day and heavy rain in PM. |
|||
0919 |
0900 |
225 |
76 |
2 |
39 |
-7 |
Partly Cloudy |
50 |
0.14 |
35 |
Cloudy in AM. Partly cloudy later AM and PM. Light ops in northern horizon at sunset. |
|||
0920 |
0800 |
206 |
74 |
18 |
46 |
7 |
Clear |
0 |
0.31 |
64 |
No ops. |
|||
0921 |
0900 |
237 |
66 |
14 |
40 |
-6 |
Clear |
0 |
0.22 |
49 |
No ops |
2300 .480 |
||
0922 |
0800 |
217 |
59 |
16 |
37 |
-3 |
Mostly |
25 |
0.21 |
46 |
No ops. Measurements 1500-1800 taken at Jack’s Creek, Elev 9500′ |
0030 .476 |
||
0923 |
0800 |
218 |
66 |
18 |
42 |
5 |
Clear |
0 |
0.29 |
61 |
No ops |
0030 .473 |
||
0924 |
0900 |
209 |
57 |
31 |
44 |
2 |
Mostly |
25 |
0.25 |
53 |
No ops. Cumulus clouds diffused by aerosols. |
1000 .479 |
||
0925 |
0800 |
240 |
59 |
25 |
42 |
-2 |
Mostly |
25 |
0.24 |
52 |
No ops. Cumulus clouds diffused by aerosols. |
0015 .474 |
||
0926 |
0800 |
230 |
49 |
31 |
40 |
-2 |
Partly |
50 |
0.17 |
40 |
No ops. Repeated diffusion of clouds by aerosol base. |
0900 .474 |
||
0927 |
0800 |
157 |
56 |
25 |
40 |
0 |
Clear |
0 |
0.20 |
44 |
No ops. |
0900 .475 |
||
0928 |
0800 |
185 |
93 |
19 |
56 |
16 |
Rain |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rain. No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. |
0030 .476 |
||
0929 |
0900 |
140 |
71 |
19 |
45 |
-11 |
Mostly |
75 |
0.05 |
19 |
No ops. |
0830 .481 |
||
0930 |
0900 |
146 |
62 |
35 |
49 |
4 |
Clear |
0 |
0.22 |
49 |
No ops. Note solar storm index @100+. |
0930 .486 |
||
1001 |
0800 |
94 |
77 |
19 |
48 |
-1 |
Partly |
50 |
0.10 |
27 |
No ops. Note solar storm index @100+. |
0015 .480 |
||
1002 |
0800 |
105 |
66 |
22 |
44 |
-4 |
Clear |
0 |
0.13 |
33 |
No ops. Solar wind storm ceases. |
1015 .494 |
||
1003 |
0800 |
99 |
65 |
20 |
43 |
-1 |
Clear |
0 |
0.13 |
33 |
No ops. Solar storm increases again. |
0915 .475 |
||
1004 |
0830 |
81 |
46 |
16 |
31 |
-12 |
Clear |
0 |
0.06 |
21 |
No ops. |
1000 .475 |
||
1005 |
0900 |
98 |
32 |
30 |
31 |
0 |
Clear |
0 |
0.11 |
30 |
No local observations available. Exclude from scoring. Exteme sinus allergic response in AM after overnight outdoor exposure in San Luus Valley CO. Visibility degradation from aerosols apparent. |
1030 .452 |
||
1006 |
0900 |
155 |
35 |
56 |
45 |
15 |
Clear |
0 |
0.30 |
62 |
No local observations available. Exclude from scoring. Reports of heavy ops in Phoenix and Tuscon and SW NM on CTTUSA after hiatus. Msmts. taken at Salida CO, Elev 7000′. |
1000 .460 |
||
1007 |
0900 |
126 |
63 |
18 |
40 |
-5 |
Partly Cloudy |
50 |
0.10 |
28 |
No ops. Increasing cloudiness. Heavy aerosol cloud bank to S. and SW. |
0930 .460 |
2400 398 |
|
1008 |
0830 |
143 |
63 |
61 |
62 |
22 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.34 |
69 |
Light to med ops. Heavy aerosol cloud bank over ABQ; in process of extending to Santa Fe. Wind increases. Dissipation of aerosol bank by 1415. Observations @1530 in Espanola NM under clear skies. |
1000 .475 |
0100 405.00 0215 405.25 0830 405.25 0900 406.00 1100 405.50 1200 404.00 1300 403.00 1900 402.00 |
7.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 -0.2 -1.5 -1.0 -0.2 RMS=2.6 n=8 |
1009 |
0800 |
128 |
64 |
23 |
44 |
-18 |
Clear |
0 |
0.08 |
24 |
No ops Local hospital employee report of increased respiratory and sinus illness amongst employees. |
0830 .474 |
0800 401.50 |
0.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 -.4 RMS=0.9 n=5 |
1010 |
0900 |
226 |
33 |
26 |
29 |
-15 |
Clear |
0 |
0.13 |
32 |
No ops. Increased reports of heavy ops across other portions of country at CTTUSA. Rapid respiratory illness onset approx 1600. |
0930 .473 |
0900 401.75 |
0.4 0.0 RMS=0.3 n=2 |
1011 |
0900 |
244 |
42 |
38 |
40 |
11 |
Clear |
0 |
0.36 |
73 |
Light ops overhead in AM. Extensive aerosol bank to west increasing throughout day. Winds increase from west. Light to med ops toward PM as haze extends. |
0930 .475 |
0900 402.00 |
0.0 -0.5 -0.1 RMS=0.3 n=3 |
1012 |
0900 |
178 |
38 |
56 |
47 |
7 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.26 |
55 |
Med to heavy operations in conjunction with aerosol based cloud bank that continues from yesterday. Significant respiratory illness continues. Note www.wundergound.com reports conditions as being continuously clear in spite of rapidly increasing “cloud” bank. Note rapid change in local magnetic field not occurring with HAARP magnetometer readings. |
1245 .473 |
1115 400.00 |
1.6 0.8 -1.4 -2.0 0.4 RMS=1.4 n=5 |
1013 |
0900 |
171 |
37 |
30 |
33 |
-14 |
Cloudy |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
Full cloud cover. No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. |
0930 .475 |
0800 400.00 |
0.0 -2.0 9.0 0.0 -1.6 0.6 -1.3 0.2 0.3 RMS=3.2 n=9 |
1014 |
0800 |
167 |
65 |
28 |
46 |
13 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.28 |
59 |
Medium to heavy ops. High level aerosol bank developing. Increasing winds again. HAARP magnetometer shows high activity for a few hours. Limited mag observations. Atmosphere trashed. |
0900 .473 |
0830 402.30 |
0.2 1.0 -0.8 RMS=0.7 n=3 |
1015 |
0830 |
175 |
42 |
38 |
40 |
-6 |
Mostly ‘Cloudy’ |
25 |
0.06 |
38 |
Light to med ops; a continuing operation. Extensive high level ‘cloud’ cover is primarily aerosol based. Relatively low level mag activity at HAARP.Extensive aerosol bank developed over ABQ carrying through sunset. Emergency broadcast system becomes active (unnannounced; no intro) on AM bands today. Consider heightened alert status. Numerous reports of heavy ops in varied locations across country. Note increased current with bank over ABQ vs Santa Fe.; Santa Fe cleared approx 2 hrs. prior to sunset. Notice sudden increase in current (i) after clearing of sky. Same event in Espanola 100802. HAARP mag remains quiet. |
0930 .477 |
0015 402.30 |
0.2 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.0 -0.0 0.4 2.0 2.0 RMS=1.0 n=9 |
1016 |
0845 |
165 |
55 |
48 |
51 |
11 |
Partly ‘Cloudy’ |
25 |
0.28 |
59 |
‘Cloud’ base is completely artificial. A major operation continues-heavy ops. Ops continued throughout previous night visible by moonlight. Low level persistent cough returns; symptoms again consistent with mycoplasma. Reports at CTTUSA of heavy ops across US and Canada continue. CME on sun Oct 14; magnetic filament collapse on Sun Oct 15. Stable I with aerosol bank. |
0900 .473 |
0900 409.60 |
0.0 -0.2 0.0 -.1 RMS=0.1 |
1017 |
0830 |
182 |
51 |
25 |
38 |
-13 |
Partly Cloudy(significant aerosol influence remains) |
50 |
0.10 |
27 |
No ops in AM hours. Effects from major operation over past 5-6 days easily visible. ‘Cloud’ base is a mix of cumulus, stratus and aerosol base. |
0830 .475 |
0800 407.25 |
0.0 0.0 RMS=0.0 n=2 |
1018 |
0900 |
215 |
80 |
26 |
53 |
15 |
Cloudy(significant aerosol influence) |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
No vertical visibility in AM..Exclude from scoring. I and B stable. Mix of cumulus and aerosol base in PM; mostly cloudy. |
0900 .473 |
0900 407.20 |
0.0 -0.3 -0.5 0.3 0.6 -0.1 0.1 0.0 RMS=0.3 n=8 |
1019 |
0900 |
200 |
73 |
33 |
53 |
0 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.25 |
54 |
No ops. Sky clears. |
LF (Low Frequency) Data Monitoring Begins |
0900 410.00 |
0.3 -0.3 0.0 RMS=0.2 n=3 |
1020 |
0830 |
156 |
74 |
33 |
53 |
0 |
Clear |
0 |
0.23 |
50 |
No ops. HAARP mag. quiet also. |
0830 406.50 |
0.0 0.0 RMS=0.0 n=2 |
|
1021 |
0900 |
179 |
54 |
29 |
42 |
-11 |
Mostly Clear. |
25 |
0.14 |
34 |
No ops. Significant aerosol influence upon ‘clouds’. HAARP mag remains quiet. Significant sunspot group has developed, #162. Mag spike at sunset – LF meter correlates. |
0015 407.50 |
0.2 0.0 0.1 -0.2 -0.0 -0.1 -1.0 0.0 -0.1 RMS=0.4 n=9 |
|
1022 |
0815 |
NA |
62 |
32 |
47 |
5 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.25 |
53 |
No ops. Med. |
0800 406.25 |
0.0 0.0 RMS=0.0 n=2 |
|
1023 |
0815 |
132 |
83 |
26 |
54 |
7 |
Partly Cloudy |
50 |
0.17 |
40 |
No ops. Thunder in AM, no rain. |
0815 405.90 |
0.0 1.3 0.1 -0.5 RMS=0.7 n=4 |
|
1024 |
0900 |
149 |
96 |
26 |
61 |
7 |
Partly Cloudy |
50 |
0.19 |
44 |
No ops. Extreme magnetic disturbance at HAARP mag in PM. |
0200 406.20 |
0.l 0.0 0.1 RMS=0.1 n=3 |
|
1025 |
0930 |
149 |
89 |
26 |
57 |
-4 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.18 |
42 |
No ops overhead in AM.. Radiosonde data not available. Extremely heavy ops begin at midday and carry through afternoon. Heavy aerosol bank visible over ABQ in late AM, extends with heavy aerosol ops over Santa Fe throughout day. LF meter depicts significant aberration. Exclude from scoring. |
0945 408.10 |
0.0 0.4 0.0 RMS=0.2 n=3 |
|
1026 |
0915 |
151 |
71 |
26 |
48 |
-9 |
Cloudy |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
Radiosonde data not available. |
0930 408.10 |
0.2 0.2 -0.2 0.3 0.2 RMS=0.2 n=5 |
|
1027 |
0930 |
143 |
89 |
32 |
61 |
13 |
Partly Cloudy |
50 |
0.22 |
48 |
No ops. |
0930 408.40 |
0.1 0.0 RMS=0.1 n=3 |
|
1028 |
0830 |
120 |
96 |
23 |
60 |
-1 |
Partly Cloudy |
50 |
0.15 |
36 |
No ops. |
0830 408.30 |
0.0 RMS=0.0 n=1 |
|
1029 |
0815 |
143 |
79 |
30 |
54 |
-6 |
Mostly Cloudy |
75 |
0.07 |
22 |
No ops visible w/in clear patches. |
0815 408.10 |
0.0 0.0 RMS=0.0 n=2 |
|
1030 |
0830 |
168 |
72 |
29 |
51 |
-3 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.19 |
44 |
No ops. |
0830 407.80 |
0.0 RMS=0 n=1 |
|
1031 |
0845 |
182 |
79 |
25 |
52 |
1 |
Clear after fog dissipates in AM. |
0 |
0.26 |
55 |
No ops directly overhead in AM. Fog in AM, clearing in AM. Major and extensive aerosol bank develops to W-NW on horizon by mid-morning. Aerosol bank extends toward easterly toward Santa Fe by md-afternoon. LF meter shows repeat concave increase in frequency structure in correspondence with encroaching aerosol bank. Sinus allergic response begins. |
0030 407.20 |
0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 RMS=0.1 n=4 |
|
1101 |
0830 |
134 |
79 |
36 |
57 |
5 |
Mostly Cloudy |
75 |
0.09 |
26 |
No ops visible within clear section on northern horizon. |
0845 407.6 |
0.0 0.1 RMS=0.1 n=2 |
|
1102 |
1000 |
169 |
81 |
10 |
45 |
-12 |
Cloudy |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. |
0915 405.2 |
-0.1 -0.2 0.9 RMS=0.5 n=3 |
|
1103 |
0845 |
177 |
47 |
45 |
46 |
1 |
Mostly Clear |
25 |
0.22 |
48 |
No ops in AM overhead.. Heavy aerosol based cloud bank in southern sky. High level aerosol based ‘clouds’ with wave formations overhead. Magnetic field shows increased activity. Solar storm index @78.Strong increase in LF frequency recorded yestereday PM and night. Artificial aerosol bank extends in coverage throughout day; appearance completely artificial. Report of demarcation line to north at Hooper CO. Aerosol ops begin and visible overhead immediately prior to sunset. Note increased magnetometer activity. LF meter shows much activity and requires repeated recalibration. |
0130 405.8 |
0.8 -0.1 0.4 -0.2 -0.8 RMS=0.5 n=5 |
|
1104 |
0845 |
217 |
100 |
2 |
51 |
5 |
Snow |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. LF meter shows significant rise in frequency throughout previous night. Note magnetometer activity. |
0100 402.1 |
-0.2 0.0 2.6 0.0 RMS=1.3 n=3 |
|
1105 |
0830 |
166 |
70 |
22 |
46 |
-5 |
Clear |
0 |
0.19 |
43 |
No ops. LF meter active. HAARP magnetometer active. |
0830 405.3 |
-0.1 -0.2 RMS=0.2 n=2 |
|
1106 |
0800 |
175 |
66 |
21 |
43 |
-3 |
Clear |
0 |
0.20 |
46 |
No ops. |
0800 404.1 |
0.0 RMS=0 n=1 |
|
1107 |
0930 |
234 |
77 |
43 |
60 |
17 |
Clear |
0 |
0.48 |
94 |
Extremely heavy ops on northern horizon and in ABQ in AM hours. Direction of ops is E-W. Aerosol bank extends over Santa Fe region through mid-day. Heavy aerosol ops conducted in SF post 1200. |
0030 407.8 |
0.2 -0.4 0.3 0.6 0.2 RMS=0.4 n=5 |
|
1108 |
0800 |
259 |
43 |
36 |
40 |
-20 |
Mostly Cloudy |
75 |
0.04 |
18 |
No ops visible within clear patches. |
0800 407.5 |
0.0 0.2 RMS=0.1 n=2 |
|
1109 |
0845 |
252 |
81 |
3 |
42 |
2 |
Rain |
100 |
10 |
No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. Note magnetometer activity. High winds. Heavy rains at night HAARP has no unusual activity; exceptionally flat magnetometer. Conflict between local mag and HAARP again. |
0845 411.2 |
0.2 -0.6 -0.6 0.9 2.4 0.4 RMS=1.1 n=6 |
||
1110 |
Rain |
100 |
0.00 |
10 |
No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. |
|||||||||
1111 |
0830 |
219 |
53 |
33 |
43 |
1 |
Mostly Cloudy |
75 |
0.10 |
28 |
No ops visible within clear patches. |
0830 408.1 |
0.2 | |
1112 |
0900 |
197 |
67 |
25 |
46 |
3 |
Clear |
0 |
0.27 |
57 |
No ops in AM. Extremely heavy ops begin at midday in narrow 20 degree band essentially directly overhead. Appears as a target zone. Aerosol bank diffuses overhead in localized region. Extremely heavy ops begin in afternoon and carry through day. Ops visible at night. Emergency broadcast comes on unannounced. Higher threat level implied through this and news accounts.Minimum no. of mag. readings. |
0900 407.2 |
0.0 | |
1113 |
0830 |
155 |
43 |
55 |
49 |
3 |
Clear w/exception to heavy ops |
0 |
0.23 |
50 |
Extremely heavy ops. Major activity. Minimum no.of mag. readings. |
0900 404.0 |
0.0 | |
1114 |
0845 |
182 |
67 |
43 |
55 |
6 |
Mostly Cloudy |
75 |
0.11 |
30 |
No ops visible. Cloud development significantly degraded by aerosol base. Note low mag reading. |
0845 397.6 |
-0.3 | |
1115 |
0900 |
185 |
89 |
30 |
60 |
5 |
Clear |
0 |
0.31 |
64 |
Direct observations not available. Exclude from scoring. |
|||
1116 |
0900 |
185 |
72 |
25 |
49 |
-11 |
Clear |
0 |
0.16 |
39 |
Direct observations not available. Exclude from scoring. Heavy ops in Durango CO. |
|||
1117 |
0900 |
162 |
46 |
42 |
44 |
-5 |
Clear |
0 |
0.18 |
42 |
Direct observations not available. Exclude from scoring.ot available. Exclude from scoring. Heavy ops in Durango CO. Heavy ops in ABQ reported. |
|||
1118 |
0900 |
139 |
36 |
25 |
31 |
-13 |
Clear |
0 |
0.10 |
27 |
No ops. Increased winds. |
0930 396.3 |
||
1119 |
0900 |
119 |
43 |
41 |
42 |
11 |
Clear |
0 |
0.21 |
47 |
No ops. Aerosol bank visible on W. horizon in afternoon. |
0900 397.5 |
||
1120 |
0930 |
105 |
46 |
32 |
39 |
-3 |
Clear |
0 |
0.13 |
32 |
No ops. Solar storm index @100+ |
0930 403.9 |
||
1121 |
0900 |
108 |
51 |
19 |
35 |
-4 |
Clear |
0 |
0.12 |
31 |
No ops. |
0900 408.7 |
||
1122 |
0900 |
143 |
65 |
19 |
42 |
7 |
Clear |
0 |
0.22 |
42 |
No ops during day. Ops begin at night, visible by moonlight. |
|||
1123 |
0800 |
124 |
57 |
33 |
45 |
3 |
Minimal natural cloud cover; aerosol banks increasing. |
0 |
0.18 |
42 |
Heavy ops apparently conducted at night; heavy aerosol bank over ABQ and extending towards Santa Fe. Med op activity overhead. Note earlier active solar storm index on 1120. |
0800 403.2 |
||
1124 |
0915 |
126 |
44 |
17 |
30 |
-14 |
Clear |
0 |
0.08 |
24 |
No ops. |
0915 407.3 |
||
1125 |
0900 |
120 |
75 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
Partly Cloudy; heavy aerosol compent to ‘cloud’ base |
50 |
0.31 |
52 |
Heavy ops in mid-day. Numerous reports of heavy activities across country.. |
|||
1126 |
0915 |
106 |
45 |
27 |
36 |
-22 |
Mostly Clear; aerosol bank on southern horizon. |
25 |
0.05 |
18 |
No ops |
0915 403.2 |
||
11274 |
0900 |
100 |
63 |
32 |
47 |
11 |
Clear |
0 |
0.19 |
44 |
No ops |
0900 403.2 |
Readers may see that the model over the interval considered is showing a fairly high level of accuracy in predicting when conditions for aerosol operations are more favorable for this region. It is to be understood that the model is NOT expected to predict the actual occurrence of operations; only the existence of favorable conditions for the operations. A failure of the model occurs when a low index value is computed but observations of heavy aerosol operations occur overhead. Failure can not be positively established when a high index is computed and heavy aerosol operations DO NOT occur, as suitable CONDITIONS only are considered within the model. Specific additional environmental and physical factors that produce failure are to be identified at that time; other citizens may wish to contribute to that goal. Additional evaluations over time will demonstrate the success or failure of this model.
It is of interest to discuss how the consideration of solar activity has come to be incorporated into this model in addition to the previous consideration of relative humidity alone. This brings to attention the events of and surrounding July 27 of this year. Observations of aerosol activity prior to this date, especially during the months of June and the first half of July 2002 appeared to be declining based upon commonly used reporting sources. During the last week of July, this appeared to change as reports suddenly and dramatically increased. On July 27 2002 the following public report was made by Lorie Kramer, a sincere and dedicated activist of Chemtrail Tracking USA:
“BLITZ in SW Houston, Sat Jul 27 2002
This is the absolute WORST spraying I have seen in quite a few months. They are laying it down and have been since early morning. The smear is thicker than I’ve seen for 2 years. INCREDIBLE. I bought a disposable camera but won’t be able to get the film developed until tomorrow or Monday, when I do I’ll post it. CREEPS!”
The same intensity of aerosol operations was further confirmed by simultaneous observations in New Mexico and Colorado from equally reliable sources. One must ask, what was unique in an environmental, meteorological or geophysical sense on or around the date of July 27, 2002 that might affect the sudden increase in intensive operations? One factor which deserves close attention is the daily sunspot number, as it ranked upon this date as one of the highest values seen within recent years. The monthly sunspot number in June had declined to 84.5, one of the lowest values of the three previous years. The daily sunspot number on July 27 reached a peak of 323, and remained at an extremely high level for several days before and after this date. This event, combined with humidity studies during the last year and a half, as well as consideration of the ionization properties of barium (see previous research) is unique enough to warrant further evaluation in the model that has been developed above. Observations over time will determine if the hypothesis of solar energy combined with humidity aspects is justified or not; studies to confirm or refute the model are welcomed by other citizens.
Scoring the model:
There are several different methods by which the model above may be evaluated; a favorable result appears to be produced by a variety of tests at this point. The means that will be chosen to evaluate is Spearman’s correlation, a non-parametric statistical test which does not require any assumptions about the distribution of the data. Spearman’s correlation is dependent upon a ranking system, which is more reasonable in this case to accomodate any subjective qualities of the observational data that is to be used. The following ranking system will be used for the observational data:
0-50 None to light ops
50-80 Light to medium ops
80-100 Medium to heavy ops
The midpoint of these intervals will be used to establish a ranking system. The details of this statistical test will not be explained here; readers may wish to refer to “Practical Statistics” by Russell Langley, Dover, 1970 for further information. The reader is not expected to follow the mechanics of this test procedure without the use of this reference or its equivalent.
The test will be completed as follows for the period from 082102 to 110802 and on 072702, with excluded values as noted above. As the tabulation of all data is lengthy, the only the final tabulations and z score computation will be shown:
n = 68
Sum of D2 = 28264
Ties:
t50 = 1 |
10412 ( 1) = 10412.5 |
t9 = 2 |
60 (2) = 120 |
t2 = 11 |
0.5 (11) = 5.5 |
t3 = 6 |
2 (6) = 12 |
t4 = 1 |
5 ( 1) = 5 |
|
Sum = 10555 |
D2 + T = 38819
(1 / 6) * (n3 – n) = 54, 740
38819 / 54740 = .709
1 – .709 = .291
Z = 681/2 * (.291) = 2.40
Z is significant at 98% level.
From the reference above (page 204), the z score for this data set is computed at 2.40. The results of this test are therefore significant at the 98%+ level. This indicates a likely significant correlation between the model data and the observational data. Correlation does not infer causality. The results of this test demonstrate that the model proposed is worthy of continued use.