PROJECT REPORT NO. 1

PROJECT REPORT NO. 1

This paper is an outline of an investigative study group (composed of researchers with backgrounds in disciplines such as electronics, communications, medicine and others) formed to give an understanding of aerosol programs and other related scientific, government, and military programs going on in the United States. This report covers aspects of aerosol programs, including but not limited to weather modification, experiments, scalar weapons, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP), ongoing research and development by the government and military, and others. This report was devised in order to get people to focus on the critical and dangerous nature of these programs, and was added to the Carnicom website.
OFFICIAL RESPONSES TO AEROSOL OPERATION INQUIRIES

OFFICIAL RESPONSES TO AEROSOL OPERATION INQUIRIES

Numerous response letters and other documents are provided in this paper that have been received from government and military agencies in response to inquiries sent to them regarding growing alarm over aerosol programs. These replies vary in their misinformation, contain lies, fabrications and denials of such programs, and have been sent from entities such as the Air Force, Secretary of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Greenpeace, Attorney Generals, and more.
CONTRAIL PHYSICS

CONTRAIL PHYSICS

This paper discusses a preliminary model developed in order to estimate the length of time required for ‘normal’ contrails to dissipate. The model developed agrees extremely well with historical behavior and observation of contrails. Conclusions that result from the study of this model include the expected rate of water vapor based contrails, and that the rates of dissipation for normal contrails are based on the size of ice crystal particulates and amount of solar radiation. A further conclusion drawn is that if an observed contrail does not conform to the model, it is likely that the material of emission is not water vapor.
EIGHT CONDITIONS

EIGHT CONDITIONS

Further exploring the need for increased testing of rainwater for pH is the subject of this paper. Eight conditions for identifying components of aerosol particulates are presented as hypotheses that if proven true will help identify these particulates being salts and trace metals such as barium and strontium.
AIR FORCE LIES TO AMERICA

AIR FORCE LIES TO AMERICA

This article is a copy of a letter from Michael K. Gibson, Lt. Col., United States Air Force in response to to US Rep. Mark Green’s inquiry into aerosols, a.k.a. ‘chemtrails’. The letter states makes incorrect statements regarding the existence of aerosol programs, as well as stating that the lines seen emanating from aircraft are normal ‘contrails’.
pH TEST ALERT

pH TEST ALERT

This paper makes the case for increased testing of pH levels in in rainwater by US citizens. At this point, there are indications that significant alterations in atmospheric chemistry have occurred due to aerosol operations. A pH test from Santa Fe, New Mexico yielded a fairly significant deviation from what was expected and is presented as an additional reason for rainwater testing.
A CASE FOR TESTING

A CASE FOR TESTING

A logical case has been developed within this article to substantiate the need for environmental testing of barium or barium compounds in our water, air and soil based on the progression of the following: 1)Meteorological studies of aerosol particulates being introduced into the atmosphere 2)Information from a highly credible source 3)Chemistry analysis of barium and barium compounds 4)pH testing of rainwater for alkalinity/acidity 5)Collection of physical samples after aerosol spraying 6)Testing of collected samples against a hypothesis that these samples are barium based 7)Solubility and equilibrium considerations of barium and barium compounds 8)Environmental testing (water, soil, air)
HALO MEASUREMENTS: INDEX OF REFRACTION (Edited May 29 2013)

HALO MEASUREMENTS: INDEX OF REFRACTION (Edited May 29 2013)

Presented in this paper is a detailed analysis of a method for determining the index of refraction of materials in the sky that produce the halos being seen around the sun after aircraft activity observed recently. The trigonometric method presented allows the calculation of not only the index of refraction, but also the angle of the halo. The significance of this method is that the chemical and physical nature of ice, as well as historic measurements, establish what the index of refraction and the halo angular measurement should be. Measurements that deviate from the expected result inform us that the materials forming the aircraft-generated halos, cirrus and cirro-stratus cloud decks are no longer composed solely of ice as if often claimed. An actual calculation is performed, using a halo from a picture presented in this paper, and applying this method for determining the index of refraction and halo angle in the picture. The measurement calculation proves that the halo in the picture is not made up of only ice, refuting previous claims of the halo being only ice.
RAINFALL pH TEST REPORTS

RAINFALL pH TEST REPORTS

This paper shows comparisons of average measured rainfall pH levels across many different areas in the US during the years 1990, 1999, and 2000. There are small differences in average rainfall pH levels across the nation when the years 1990 and 1999 are compared for each region measured, but the year 2000 shows significant increases in pH levels over both years 1990 and 1999, with some increases upwards of 73% in the year 2000 over earlier 1990 levels. This depicts a large change in atmospheric chemistry across many regions of the US in 2000 over earlier years.
USAF LT. COL. GIBSON EXTENDS LIE TO REP. FAZIO

USAF LT. COL. GIBSON EXTENDS LIE TO REP. FAZIO

This paper is the actual letter sent from USAF Lt. Colonel Gibson to Representative Fazio regarding the USAF’s official explanation of what aerosols really are. Lt. Col. Gibson sends a canned reply to an inquiry from Rep. Fazio explaining that aerosols are really condensation (contrails) that are harmless and normal, and that that aerosols are a hoax despite growing evidence of their existence.