Another letter from the EPA claiming to be unaware of aerosol operations is included in this paper, despite the initial notification of accumulating evidence on the aerosol spraying on December 9, 1999. This is one of several communications from the EPA claiming to be “unaware” of any such activities. At this time, Carol Browner, the Administrator of the EPA, also refused to acknowledge the existence of a physical sample sent to her by certified mail on June 20, 2000, along with the refusal to identify the material in this sample.
A letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Clifford Carnicom states the intention of the EPA is to not analyze the samples sent to them by Mr. Carnicom previously. Rather, they attached their same letter of refusal from earlier in the year that describes their view that aerosols and such programs do not exist, and that it is normal contrails that are showing in the skies that people are reporting.
A copy of a certified letter sent by Clifford Carnicom on June 9, 2000 to Carol M. Browner, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is attached in this paper that outlines how Ms. Browner has been negligent in not investigating and analyzing hazardous biological samples sent previously to the EPA that pose human health risks. This letter makes clear that Ms. Browner and the EPA are responsible for reporting to the American public, and having not been forthcoming with an interest to look into the requests for sample analysis, Ms. Browner and the EPA are to be held accountable for the lack of integrity of the EPA.
A copy of the Certified Receipt showing EPA Administrator received Clifford Carnicom’s sample.
Here is a copy of the Certified Receipt showing EPA Administrator Carol M. Browner received Clifford Carnicom’s sample, but had yet to reply.
A lengthy letter from the EPA, sent to a concerned citizen and copied on this page, is a complete denial of the possibility of aerosols and aerosol operations. The letter speaks a common theme of denial that the spray lines, witnessed by an increasing number of people and spreading out across the sky, are simply normal contrail exhaust from aircraft engines.
The process of submitting protest letters via www.carnicom.com began on Nov 20 1999, and thus far includes over 1700 letters sent to federal and state officials. This statement affects letters that have been sent to state officials only.
Postscript note by Clifford E Carnicom:
One would logically conclude that the EPA, having viewed the evidence submitted on www.carnicom.com, IS now quite aware of "such applications" by "such aircraft."
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DECLARES THAT IT IS 'UNABLE' TO COMPLETE AN INVESTIGATION
This letter was recently received by a Ohio citizen:
Eyewitness accounts of finding unusual fiber materials on the ground have been accumulated over the past year and more in direct connection with unusual aircraft activity. As might be expected, there are repeated, frequent and widespread accounts of respiratory distress and allergic reactions reported in association with such aircraft activity. This paper continues previous research on and presents microscopic views of suspected chemtrail ground samples collected in November and December 1999. Two identical ground fiber samples (one from Sacramento, CA, and one from eastern Oregon) were received, analyzed and compared to synthetic and natural fibers, such as human hair, wool, silk, spider webs, cotton and more. Though found in locations hundreds of miles apart, these two ground fibers exhibited identical characteristics in all respects down to the microscopic level. Based on tests outlined in this paper, it has been demonstrated that the ground sample fibers cannot be identified as any known or common natural or synthetic fiber.