MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE COUNT STUDY NEW MEXICO 1996-1999

MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE COUNT STUDY NEW MEXICO 1996-1999

Driven by repeated observations of aerial spraying in the United States in the years from 1996-2000, a statistically significant study of airborne microscopic particle count data from the State of New Mexico was conducted, with approximately 175,000 observations of hourly monitored data from five stations in the state analyzed. This statistical test has been designed to question the difference between the data of 1999 (Data set 1) vs. the combined data of the three previous years from 1996-1998 (Data set 2). The results show that there is a significant statistical difference between the magnitudes, averages, and variances of the two data sets. The conclusion to be reached from this study is that the microscopic air particle count in the state of New Mexico in 1999 is significantly different from that of the preceding three years, and that this difference is directly correlated with the observations of aerial spraying that have taken place during this same time period. The results of this study form a further basis for criminal investigation of the documented spray activity and for congressional hearings on this subject.
EPA CONTINUES TO BE ‘UNAWARE’

EPA CONTINUES TO BE ‘UNAWARE’

A lengthy letter from the EPA, sent to a concerned citizen and copied on this page, is a complete denial of the possibility of aerosols and aerosol operations. The letter speaks a common theme of denial that the spray lines, witnessed by an increasing number of people and spreading out across the sky, are simply normal contrail exhaust from aircraft engines.
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN CLASSIFIES INQUIRY AS ‘HARASSMENT’

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN CLASSIFIES INQUIRY AS ‘HARASSMENT’

University of Michigan Correspondence with Individual Seeking Information on Nano Technology Research Program: TIME LINE OVERVIEW: 1. Letter to Dr. Jones - DARPA - Nov. 15th from A. C. Griffith. 2. Reply from the Director of DARPA, Lawrence H. Dubois, Nov. 16th to A.C. Griffith. 3. A.C.Griffith made one telephone call and one e-mail to Univ. of Mich., News and Information Service, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Nov. 17th. 4. E-mail to A.C. Griffith received from Officer Sura on computer in Winston-Salem. 5. Telephone message to A.C. Griffith on answering machine in Richmond from Officer Sura, University of Michigan, sometime between Nov. 19 and Nov. 21, 1999. 6. Reply letter to Officer Sura dated Nov. 22, 1999.
AEROSOL GROUND SAMPLE: MICROSCOPIC VIEWS

AEROSOL GROUND SAMPLE: MICROSCOPIC VIEWS

Microscopic views are presented of two filaments taken from a ground fiber sample after aerial spraying in eastern Oregon on November 2nd and November 4th, 1999. Observation and analysis indicate that the samples appear to be a polymer of some type, being both extremely elastic and adhesive, raising the possibility that this material may act as a carrier mechanism. The materials are white, and look like spider webs. The materials, under magnification, show individual strands that are wave-like in nature, and tend to coalesce and congeal easily. Ill health effects have been reported in association with the handling of this material. This material is reported to dissipate within a few hours of falling on the ground, and in being exposed to the weather. The ground fiber sample images are compared to and found not to be spider webs, and to be fully synthetic. Common health effects associated with this spraying include severe respiratory problems, burning eyes, feeling tired, and some people coughing up blood.
AEROSOL GROUND SAMPLES : MICROSCOPIC FIBERS REVEALED

AEROSOL GROUND SAMPLES : MICROSCOPIC FIBERS REVEALED

Eyewitness accounts of finding unusual fiber materials on the ground have been accumulated over the past year and more in direct connection with unusual aircraft activity. As might be expected, there are repeated, frequent and widespread accounts of respiratory distress and allergic reactions reported in association with such aircraft activity. This paper continues previous research on and presents microscopic views of suspected chemtrail ground samples collected in November and December 1999. Two identical ground fiber samples (one from Sacramento, CA, and one from eastern Oregon) were received, analyzed and compared to synthetic and natural fibers, such as human hair, wool, silk, spider webs, cotton and more. Though found in locations hundreds of miles apart, these two ground fibers exhibited identical characteristics in all respects down to the microscopic level. Based on tests outlined in this paper, it has been demonstrated that the ground sample fibers cannot be identified as any known or common natural or synthetic fiber.
ACTIVIST REPORTS EXTENSIVE HARASSMENT

ACTIVIST REPORTS EXTENSIVE HARASSMENT

POSTED: October 11, 1999 6:45am EST Christian Intelligence Advisory Exclusive http://www.tiac.net/users/tobya/ciaindex.html Aerosols, JFK, Jr. Activist Reports Extensive Harassment, Possible Attempt on Life by Andrew Amirault October 11, 1999 BOSTON, MA--Andrew Carbone, Jr., 35, of Middleboro, Massachusetts, claims he has been repeatedly and intensely harassed since beginning to seek answers from federal authorities regarding the "chemtrails" phenomenon, and after providing a videotape, related to the JFK. Jr. death, to a local TV station.
PRELIMINARY METEOROLOGICAL STUDY

PRELIMINARY METEOROLOGICAL STUDY

An analysis of upper altitude relative humidity data (average relative humidity during this 21 day analysis was 37.5% with a sample standard deviation of 11.7%) in Santa Fe, New Mexico in 1999 refutes the argument that such upper atmospheric conditions should allow for persistent contrails and subsequent cloud formations. It is known at this time that relative humidity levels in the upper atmosphere well below 60% will generally produce clear to semi-clear skies, and normal contrails should dissipate quickly under these conditions. However, the series of pictures included in this paper show the spraying of trails becoming long duration persistent cloud formations that should not have been logically possible with such a low relative humidity on these days of testing.
VISITORS TO WWW.CARNICOM.COM

VISITORS TO WWW.CARNICOM.COM

A very interesting yet concerning list of 126 different organizations that had visited the Carnicom website in 1999 is presented in this paper. These include U.S. Government entities such as the Pentagon, Air Force, Army, Navy, NASA, TRW (military contractor), Boeing, Raytheon, Lockheed-Martin, Rockwell-Collins, Monsanto, and many more. Many of those listed were repeat visits to the site.
The Santa Fe Contrail (Aerosol) Journal

The Santa Fe Contrail (Aerosol) Journal

Various news items from the Santa Fe Contrail Journal are included here that speak to the aerosol programs and their effects. Included in this work are news items such as NASA coming up with a new cloud name (Cirrus contrailus) to describe the aerosol clouds; despite mainstream media ignoring such news, it was reported tjat during week 19 of 1999, the percentage of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza reported by 166 US cities was 6.8%, being approximately epidemic threshold; and news of William Thomas’ involvement with groups opposed to the aerosol spraying.
WILLIAM THOMAS TO SPEAK ASPEN COLORADO

WILLIAM THOMAS TO SPEAK ASPEN COLORADO

William Thomas' "Chemtrails Over America" Speaking Tour Comes to Aspen, Colorado on August 21st As an award-winning investigative journalist with 30 years' professional experience, William Thomas was the first reporter to break the story on national media about large-scale aerial spraying of pathogens or aerosols across North America by unmarked tanker-type refueling aircraft. Thomas will present information about his latest aerosols research at the Aspen District Theater (at the Aspen Elementary School on Maroon Creek Road) on Saturday August 21st at 7:00 p.m. Tickets are $15. To date, Thomas has obtained more than 500 interviews and detailed written reports from every corner of the USA describing an aerial phenomenon underway for the past several years. Two years ago, William Wallace was plowing fields on a ranch in Washington state when someone declared war on him. Without warning or provocation, a US Navy Intruder got real sick for about three weeks," Wallace relates. "My eyes watered. Fluid came out of my nose..." Headaches and extreme joint pain restricted his movements and drained his vitality. He was soon fired for being unproductive.
Read U.S. Federal Code on Biological Testing on U.S. Citizens [TITLE 50, SECTION 1520(a)]

Read U.S. Federal Code on Biological Testing on U.S. Citizens [TITLE 50, SECTION 1520(a)]

Please note Section C of this federal statute as highlighted below, which requires PERMISSION FROM EACH SUBJECT in advance of biological testing. Please relay the content of this law accurately to your fellow citizens. US Code on Human Subjects Testing as REVISED in Nov 1997 U.S. CODE TITLE 50, SECTION 1520(a) S 1520. Repealed. Pub L. 105-85, Div. A, Title X, S 1078(g), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1916 S 1520a. Restriction on the use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents